Irrevocable Prerogative Writ of Commands
Bills Exchange Act 1909 (Commonwealth) and for Addressee’s Performance of Judiciary Act 1903 (Commonwealth) Section 66.
Schedule: For onshore enforcement and also valid for foreign registration and enforcement
Geelong, Victoria
Writ No:
H.R.M – 01204102
IRREVOCABLE WRIT PREROGATIVES AWARDED
1. This Court hereby commands that these Irrevocable Prerogatives as herein awarded within this Writ are irrevocable Royal
Prerogative commands for restitution hereby awarded and hereby commanding for the Addressee and for its officers, Cabinet
Ministers, Executive Councillors, agents and subordinates to each fully comply with the commands given and awarded herein
forthwith and in good faith as well as in compliance with Ministerial Oaths of Allegiance given to Her Majesty from when forming the
Commonwealth of Australia’s current Government of the day and when forming the Cabinet and the Executive Council in 2013; and
a. the Addressee is to comply forthwith upon legal service of this Writ being deemed effected on the Addressee by mail posted via its
Finance Minister; and
b. to whomever else these commands shall come, are to fully adhere to and comply with these irrevocable and binding commands for
immediate restitution by way of ensuring that the Addressee satisfies the Sum Certain that is to be fully paid to the Beneficiary by
way of Reserve Bank of Australia Cheques (“RBA Cheques”) made-out irrevocably payable to the full and complete satisfaction of
the Beneficiary under the irrevocable full faith and credit of the Addressee.
THE ADDRESSEE
2. The Commonwealth of Australia is the Addressee within this Irrevocable Prerogative Writ of Commands which is extraordinarily
akin to being also a Writ of Error and a Writ of Execution and thereby the Addressee is hereby irrevocably commanded to perform in
full compliance by immediately satisfying the commands of enforcement as hereon endorsed and as awarded and commanded
herein by this Prerogative Court against the Addressee for full and immediate compliance via its agents, subordinates, acceptor
bank tellers, and or via its political officers’ own hands.
THE BENIFICIARY
3. This Court Verifies and Certifies that Kenneth-Clyde Ivory is the Holder of a 7th February 2005 duly issued bill of exchange as per
the sealed copy accepted via the hand of the Hon. Senator Helen Coonan as the Portfolio Minister and as the then Major Telstra
Shareholder for the Commonwealth of Australia (the “Addressee”) in Canberra, A.C.T situated within the Commonwealth of
Australia, when the Bill’s sealed copy was also successfully delivered by Kenneth-Clyde Ivory (the “Beneficiary”) on 8th February
2005 direct to the Addressee via Minister Coonan.
4. Kenneth-Clyde Ivory as the Holder of the above said Bill and of its 2nd December 2013 successful Protest and of its 2nd December
2013 successfully Protested Set of Commercial Instruments which are referred to as the “Bill” inclusive with a copy of the Bill’s
'independent accountant’s loss, injury and damage, in the independent loss assessment report’ (being in total the then “Principal
Debt Sum”) that was back then the then Sum Certain and a true copy thereof was on the 7th February 2005 sealed and combined
within the Bill, a full copy of the then issued in part Bill was back then served by the hand of the herein Beneficiary when hand-
to-hand mutual delivery to the Addressee from the Beneficiary officially took place on the 8th February 2005.
IRREVOCABLE PREROGATIVE FINANCIAL AWARDS AND RESTITUTION COMMANDS
5. This Court awards and commands that Kenneth-Clyde Ivory is the hereby successful Beneficiary of this Irrevocable Writ and of its
irrevocable commands as awarded full current Sum Certain as is herein below stated and is to be paid direct to the Beneficiary as is
hereby commanded by this Court of Jurisdiction against the Addressee, commanding hereby for the Addressee to immediate and
honourably perform in good faith by and for and on behalf of the Addressee by fully satisfying the herein below stated current Sum
Certain from and out of monies that are legally available to the Addressee to satisfy this public debt’s current Sum Certain direct to
the Beneficiary by way of irrevocable RBA Cheques; and
a. this Court’s jurisdiction is also pursuant to the bills of exchange act, and does hereby award and commands that the Bill’s
Sovereign Public Debt’s total combined current Sum Certain as set-out below is to be fully satisfied immediately by the
Addressee by way of irrevocable RBA Cheques to be made out to and also to be paid direct to the Beneficiary before
Maturity Date expiry of 4 PM on the 11th March 2014; however
b. it is also hereby commanded that the Bill and the validity of this Writ pertaining to the Bill remains legally binding and will
not and does not expire until the Addressee has first irrevocably fully satisfied this entire and still accruing fully unsettled
CoT or CoT-related sovereign public debt that is to be fully satisfied by way of RBA Cheques and is to be paid irrevocably
to the full satisfaction of the Beneficiary; and
c. it is Commanded that the below stated current Sum Certain is to be fully satisfied and irrevocably paid to the Beneficiary
by way of three (“3”) individually written and drawn RBA Cheques that are to be paid-out from monies that are legally
available to the Addressee and or to its Future Fund as its Future Fund’s funds are the Addressee’s financial guarantor
and the RBA Cheques are to each be drawn and made payable in good faith by the RBA and each of the RBA’s three (3)
Cheques are to made out to be irrevocably payable to Kenneth-Clyde Ivory (the “Beneficiary”) as it is hereby commanded
that the Bill‘s Sum Certain is to be paid via the RBA as the RBA is irrevocably the acceptance bank for the Addressee:
Cheque 1 for 7/02/2005 - Bill of Exchange Principal Debt Sum = AUD Deleted for Protection
Cheque 2 for Interest from 9.03.2006 to 9.02.2014 =
AUD Deleted for Protection
(Principal debt & accrued interest combined Subtotal): = AUD Deleted for Protection
Cheque 3 for Fully-Franked-Dividends 23/09/2006 to 09.02.14 =
AUD Deleted for Protection
ABOVE COMBINED
currently owing Sum Certain =
AUD Deleted for Protection
d. thereby the combined total current
Sum Certain
payable forthwith is
DELETED FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES
in Australian
Currency that is hereby commanded to be fully satisfied forthwith as above commanded by way of three (3) separate RBA
Cheques as per the three (3) amounts itemised above; and
e. it is also hereby irrevocably commanded for the total Sum Certain to be fully and irrevocably satisfied fully free of and thereby
fully exempted from all taxes, all duties, charges, and without any fees or deductions whatsoever being charged at all to the
Beneficiary as is already duly authorised by or for the Addressee when officially approved via the Addressee’s Finance
Department on the 23.09.2008; and
f. it is also commanded that if any impediments have been recorded adversely on any public or on any corporate financial records
or on any other court’s records against or in the name of the Beneficiary the Man or Corporately whatsoever it would have
maliciously occurred resultant from the Beneficiary having been unconscionably made and politically forced and named as being
a CoT or CoT-related victim, therefore the Addressee’s current Prime Minister via his Attorney-General is hereby commanded to
have any adversely recorded impediments irrevocably and
fully expunged forthwith
as if they never occurred
as that is part of
these herein commanded restitutions, as any such financial or court recorded impediments if they do exist or if they have existed
then they would have been maliciously and criminally procured by wilful misuses and abuses of the Addressee’s public funds to
further defame, injure, sabotage, boycott and to maliciously keep defrauding and injuring the Beneficiary to try and conceal and
to try to avoid paying this sovereign public debt’s current Sum Certain, created solely by the corrupt lawyers and law firms
involved in defrauding the Beneficiary (“the Man”) and corporate reputations.
LEGAL SERVICE AND FINANCIAL RESTITUTION COMMANDS
It is therefore commanded hereby that a true photo copy of this Writ of this Court is to be legally served addressed to the Addressee and served on it via EXPRESS POST service via the Finance Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia the Hon. Senator Mathias Cormann addressed to his electoral office and or alternatively to his Parliament House Suite address and that legal service photo copy is to be addressed and posted by the hand of the Beneficiary into any Australia Post - Yellow Postal Box and the Minister is to table that copy in the very next Cabinet Meeting for full payment to be immediately Cabinet appropriated and arranged via the RBA:
THE ADDRESSEE IS THE: Commonwealth of Australia (“CoA”- the Bill’s “Debtor Party”)
MINISTER RESPONSIBLE: Minister for Finance the Hon. Senator Mathias Cormann
BILL’S ACCEPTOR BANK: Addressee’s Acceptor Bank is the Reserve Bank of Australia
DATE OF COMMANDS: Issued hereby in Geelong, Victoria, on 18th February 2014
WRIT MATURITY DATE IS: Before 4 PM on Tuesday March 11th 2014
WRIT DEBT TO BE PAID: In the Currency of the Commonwealth of Australia (“AUD”)
CURRENT SUM CERTAIN: The total current Sum Certain is: AUD Deleted for Protection
WRIT BENIFICIARY: Kenneth-Clyde Ivory (he is also the Bill’s “Creditor Party”)
DEBT PAYMENT DETAILS: Kenneth-Clyde Ivory - Deleted for Protection.
REASONS FOR THIS WRIT’S IRREVOCABLE PREROGATIVE JUSTICE
7. The reasons for this extraordinary and irrevocable writ of commands are additionally resultant from the tacit acquiescence and tacit
acceptance given by the Addressee seeing its 2013 elected Prime Minister, Treasurer and Finance Minister were each served by
Express Post after they had been sworn-in under their Oaths of Allegiance given to Her Majesty but each Ministerially remained
silent and thereby they Ministerially chose in good faith to not rebut or to dispute by not responding with any sworn Ministerial
rebuttals to the Beneficiary’s 9.10.13 sworn document headed ‘A Verified Plain Statement of Facts’ that is Commonwealth DFAT
legalised as being Public Document No. M00095684 as was officially sworn by the Beneficiary under oath before this Court; and
a. also resultant by the Addressee and the former government’s Ministerial contempt of this Court and of Her Majesty’s authority
invested in this Court and of the jurisdiction given to this Court in this bill of exchange debt matter through the said bills of
exchange act which public service ingrained treasonous contempt and dishonourable culture of the past is still being evidenced by
the Addressee’s default and failure to have the Addressee perform in compliance with this Court’s 2.12.13 issued and duly sealed
‘Notarial Certificate of Protest’ that is Commonwealth DFAT legalised as Public Document No. M00097795.
8. Thereby the prerogative of justice herein commanded is based on the facts that the Beneficiary of the Bill and its set of commercial
instruments is still an outstanding Casualty of Telstra (CoT or CoT-related) victim since about the 1st November 1993 forward
being from well before the Bill came into effect in February 2005 and who has been boycotted and sabotaged by serious acts of bad
faith due to competing loyalties within the public service, and within their public funded agents’ and servants legal firms’ involved
who acted criminally and with gross competing loyalties, thereby the Beneficiary is discriminately and unconscionably still and is
currently the only remaining fully unsettled CoT or CoT-related public debt as is still fully owing by the Addressee to the
Beneficiary; also
a. is still unsettled resultant by corporate, political, public service and legal profession criminal and constructive frauds publically
funded over many years that resulted in and are thereby resultant from the Beneficiary discriminately and unconstitutionally
having been wilfully omitted and denied his constitutional right by having NOT been included and invited to give evidence to and
before the 24th June 1997 Senate Estimates Committee Enquiry held into Telstra’s 1995/96 Annual Reports and into settled
and unsettled CoT and CoT-related matters; and
b. this irrevocable Writ is therefore constitutionally a case of right and the Addressee is hereby commanded to pay this public
debt’s Sum Certain and which payment obligation owing by the Addressee is hereby now a Commanded duty of the Addressee to
perform and fully satisfy this public debt forthwith.
9. This Court commands that a true copy of this Writ is all that needs to be served by the Beneficiary for immediate payment to be fully
paid by the Addressee by way of RBA Cheques as full proof of the matters and instruments referred to herein or too whomever else
these commands and awards may concern onshore and or offshore.
PREROGATIVE COURT OF JURISDICTION
10. I am this Court of Jurisdiction’s GARNET STEWART FIELDING of 33 Retreat Road, Newtown, Victoria, and by Royal Authority, I
am duly authorised, admitted, sworn and practising as a Notary Public in the Greater City of Geelong, in the State of Victoria,
situated within the Commonwealth of Australia, and DO HEREBY CERTIFY AND ATTEST that my Notarial Appointment
commenced in 1984 when commissioned as a public officer of this Court Constituted by Law and by Royal Authority for life, when
appointed by the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury’s Court of Faculties at Westminster as a Notary Public and thereby commissioned
as an official judicial officer of this Court hereby acting for and on behalf of Her Royal Majesty, Queen Elizabeth the Second, Lawful
Sovereign and Head of State of the Commonwealth of Australia (the “Crown of Right”) commissioned to practice in this Court of
Jurisdiction for and as one of Her Majesty’s Notary Publics.
11. Thereby in accordance with the provisions of the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia and also pursuant with this Court’s
Prerogative Jurisdiction encompassed within the Court of Faculties entrusted medieval but still binding special powers, and under
the authorisation designated within the Bills of Exchange Act 1909 (Commonwealth), I DO IN FAITH AND TESTAMONY in the
State of Victoria, and have below duly subscribed my name and have set and affixed this Court’s Official Seal in Geelong by the
Royal Authority invested in this Court with Royal Prerogative authority and therefore herein and hereon I have in good faith
irrevocably issued my Prerogative Writ Commands for and on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Lawful Sovereign
and Head of State of the Commonwealth of Australia, on this eighteenth (18th) day of February in the Year of Our Lord two
thousand and fourteen:
......................................................................
GARNET STEWART FIELDING
NOTARY PUBLIC
GEELONG, AUSTRALIA
Note: The above Notary Public is a properly appointed Notary Public via the
HEAD OFFICE of the: Court of Faculties, in Westmister.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Australian Civil Authority
STATEMENT in the matter of: Place: Werris Creek. [Assembly]
JENNIFFER KOENIG Date: 8 October 2010
ANTHONY ASOME and
ALICE SPURGIN the Defendants
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Name: Australian Civil Authority
Address: PO Box 65 Werris Creek NSW 2341 STATES:-
1. This statement made by the Australian Civil Authority accurately sets out evidence which the Australian Civil Authority would be
prepared, if necessary, to give in Court as a witness. The statement, to the best of knowledge and belief is true and is made knowing
that, if it is tendered in evidence, the Australian Civil Authority shall be liable to prosecution if wilfully stating anything which is
known to be false or do not believe to be true.
2. The three (3) Defendants, Koenig, Asome and Spurgin were and are employed as Commonwealth of Australia Public Servants, with
the Department of Finance and Deregulation situated at PARKS in CANBERRA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY.
3. On Monday 23 February 2009, each of the three (3) Defendants did wilfully sign their names to Misleading and Deceptive Affidavits,
knowing the Affidavits to be False, with Koenig and Asome attaching identical forged and uttered, bogus annexure to their purported
affidavits, with now sworn oath or affirmation given and allegedly witnessed and signed by Spurgin, who falsely claimed that she was
a licensed practising Legal Practitioner. It has been verified by the Court Registrar that Spurgin was not registered with the Canberra
Supreme Court in the Australian Capital Territory, nor could she as according to law, validly act as an affidavit witness.
4. The False, Misleading and Deceptive Affidavits were tendered at the IVORY –v- TELSTRA trial in the BRISBANE FEDERAL
MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA to bolster Court Evidence and to mislead Justice Wilson on Friday 27 March 2009.
5. The annexure attached to the affidavits of Koenig and Asome and, who both testified in Court by video link-up from Canberra, that
the Certificate No: CoA – 8002932 dated Tuesday 23 September 2008, signed by Koenig and Asome as a ‘Departmental Copy’ and
was annexure to their Monday 23 February 2009, affidavits as such.
6. Evidence has been revealed and shows that the Certificate No: CoA – 8002932 dated Tuesday 23 September 2008, could not have
been a ‘Departmental Copy’ retained on that date as stated and attached as annexure “C” and “A” concurrently to Koenig and Asome
7. Affidavits due to the fact of certain occurrences the following day.It was Wednesday 24 September 2008, when a copy of the
Original Certificate was certified by AUTHUR BILLINGTON a Justice of the Peace, No: 391 in Canberra to be a true copy, and the
Wednesday date 24 September 2008, was entered onto the Certificate.
8. The Australian Civil Authority is of the belief, that there exists a prima facia case of perjury against the three (3) Defendants from
Canberra, who signed affidavits prepared in Brisbane knowing them to be false, so as to mislead Justice Wilson and pervert the
course of justice in the Brisbane Magistrates Court of Australia.
9. The near identical in form and substance affidavits, were hastily prepared by Practitioners acting for Telstra in Brisbane then
transferred to Canberra, where, purportedly on Monday 23 February 2009, the affidavits were separately signed by both Koenig
and Asome and fraudulently witnessed by Spurgin, so as to be filed and served in time for the Friday 27 March 2009, Brisbane Court
hearing.
10. No photo copy whatsoever of the Certificate No: CoA – 8002932, certified on Wednesday 24 September 2008, was ever retained
by KOENIG or ASOME for the Canberra Department of Finance and Deregulation on Tuesday 23 September 2008, as a
‘Department Copy’, as was stated in the two (2) falsely prepared affidavits signed by KOENIG and ASOME.
11. This matter has a long history, with an element of scandal throughout. It is public knowledge that the Practitioners acting for and on
behalf of Telstra and with its influence was able to wrongfully arrest Mr. Ivory on 23 December 1996, a crime committed in offence
of 3ZT of the Crimes Act 1914 (Clth) in his pursuit for compensation from the Commonwealth of Australia as a longstanding
Casualty of Telstra (CoTs) victim. In April 1999, the Federal Senate Estimates Committee’s findings were handed down in relation
to five (5) other CoTs victims, who were reported to have been paid $15 million in loss, injury and damage in accordance with the
Senate enquiry and findings into the CoTs Victims Compensation Claim against Telstra.
12. Mr. Ivory is still today an outstanding commercially unsettled CoTs victim, which is the reason for these ongoing harrowing Court
and bogus proceedings, instigated under the watch by the then Telstra’s Chief Executive Officer Mr Zygmunt (Ziggy) Edward
Switkowski against Mr. Kenneth-Clyde Ivory.
Please Note:
The original of this Witness Statement has been officially sealed by the
Great Seal of the AUSTRALIAN CIVIL AUTHORITY – Liberty to all People.
But a scanned copy of it was unable to be attached to this Web Site: www.cabinettactics.com so it had to be re-typed directly herein.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Extrinsic Fraud & Intrinsic Fraud
Both Crimes were Perpetrated by misuses & abuses of Commonwealth Public Funds
It is very sad and is also a very 'Suspicious Transaction' that by Politically HAND PICKED and Appointed Telstra officers of the Commonwealth did strategically retain and seconded on about the 15 May 1994 in abuse of Public Funds STEPHEN JOHN MEAD via Mallesons Stephen Jaques partner and Chairman Stanley Howard (a brother of now former Prime Minister John Winston Howard MP).
MEAD then wilfully perpetrated Extrinsic Frauds due to the 1800 prefix systemic faults collateral liability circumstances hence Extrinsic Frauds were preditorily perpetrated with premeditated criminal intent and those Extrinsic Frauds and Criminality resulted in Intrinsic Frauds then being wilfully falsely, bogusly and fraudulently perpetrated by criminality of one key pepetrating and competing and conflicting dual income officers of the Commonwealth on the 23 December 1996 and which White-Collar-Crimes were wilfully followed-up by others being induced into aiding and abetting to conceal those crimes as did the legal practitioners and Queens Counsel involved by then committing Intrinsic Frauds to dishonestly cover-up and conceal the 23 December 1996 crimes, then in 2009 by three (3) more officers of the Commonwealth wilfully perjuring themselves on the 23 February 2009 as detailed above Witness Statement given by and from the Australian Civil Authority.
All of the perpetrators unlawful inducements were fraudulently perpetrated to also dishonestly aid and abet in concealing how three (3) State of Queensland Judges in the State's Court of Appeal in 2002 colluded with and to protect the State's moonlighting retainer bribed Solicitor-General who they each had found had definitely misled the trial judge in 2001 and then one (1) Federal Magistrate in 2009/10 was induced to aid and abet in concealing and covering-up those earlier judges crimes and so did a Federal Court Judge in 2010. Each corruptly became implicated in aiding and abetting in concealment and avoidance of those collateral circumstances such as:
* Fraudulent acts which kept Kenneth-Clyde Ivory from obtaining information about his rights to enforce his rights and prevented him
being able to fund defending against bogus law suits. Telstra officers of the Commonwealth also falsified its records and destroyed
evidence and engaged in misleading & deceptive conduct to prevent Telstra and its officers being capable of being successfully sued.
The Etrinsic Frauds also involved Collateral Liability Avoidance Tactics and Deflection of Circumstances, by their acts of:
* Bribery or Inducment of Judges and of the competing and conflicting loyalty Queens Counsel and that Public Funded Retainer Bribed
QC the now former Solicitor-General of the State of Queensland has since been corruptly politically rewarded by political Cabinet
Member status and salary increased judicial elevations firstly in 2005 by the State of Queensland being elevated to its Court of Appeal
replacing the judge he replaced when made the Solicitor-General who acted corruptly in 2002 to protect him and the in 2010 when by
Kevin Rudd PM was elevated to the Federal Court Judiciary and then further rewarded by Julia Gillard PM to become a High Court
Judge.
The other two (2) 2002 corrupted State of Queensland Appeal Court Justices one was formerly an articles clerk in the
State's Solicitor-General's office then its prosecutor and the third judge she was formerly an articles clerk at Ruth Freezling in
Brisbane under the 2002 State's moonlighting Solicitor-General and she was also at the same time an articles clerk under the MSJ
senior partner when he was also starting out as a lawyer also at Ruth Freezlings in Brisbane. = Insidious Corruption at the top!
So we had undisclosed gross conflicts of interests and corruptly competing and conflicting loyalities in a judicially stacked
purported court back n 2002.
Furthermore that above referred to MSJ partner acting for TELSTRA & MEAD was thereby a fellow lawyer at Ruth Freezling's law firm as a work mate with the now High Court Judge. All resulted in not just Suspicious Transactions but resulted in them collectively acting in concert to deceive and fraudulently pervert and defeat the course of justice for collateral rewards, and resulted in them implicated in fraud on the Courts and fraud by the Courts:
* including but not limited too fabrication of evidence by attorney's;
* preventing IVORY'S witnesses from appearing;
* intentionally failing to join other necessary parties; and
* misleading another party into thinking they need to perjure themselves to aid and abet in concealing their attorney's crimes.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
We the sovereign People of Australia proclaim the creation of the
Australian Civil Authority
Liberty to all People
PO BOX 66
Werris Creek NSW 2341
Australia
TO: THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE K. WILSON
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harry Gibbs Commonwealth Law Courts Building
Level 6
119 North Quay
BRISBANE QLD. 4000
Dear Magistrate
RE: F.M.C. of Aust. File No:- (P) BRG of 2008. IVORY -v- TELSTRA & MEAD.
Apart from the Australian Federal Police having been informed and the civil rights of citizens, Australian Civil Authority is now ascertaining by careful inquiry the perjury committed, elements of scandal, professional negligence and conduct in Court proceedings throughout this matter’s long history and stultified without any decision on the merits, or on the evidence of the parties, reputably not in the interests of justice because, the decisions involve an error of principle and an error of substantial justice, in order, as according to Rightful Australian Justice not pursuant to the Westminster Parliamentary System based on Christian Philosophy.
Whereby, in the circumstances it is in the public interest having regard to the nature of the evidence.
Yours sincerely
For and on behalf
Executive Council
April 1, 2009
c.c. Australian Federal Police Spring Hill Qld. 4000
c.c. Mallesons Stephen Jaques
c.c. Kenneth-Clyde Ivory
The Australian Civil Authority member of the International Civil Authority.
Disclosure of correspondence, documents and investigations are open to transparency and public scrutiny.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________